Original analysis and source reporting are different
An original GameInfo insight must help complete a task or explain an observed result. A worked numerical example, a discovered comparison error or an explicit data limitation is a contribution. Rephrasing a publisher description or collecting links does not, by itself, qualify a page as original research.
A briefing attributes an announcement or report, preserves its publication date and identifies what has not been independently tested. Optional source records are available inside the reader. We do not copy full media articles or present an aggregation count as independent confirmation.
The publication gate
Content is selected for a defined reader question. Sources must be traceable, dates must be accurate and calculations must be reproducible from the cited record. Unknown values stay unknown. Corrections should state the substantive change rather than quietly relabel old evidence as new.
There is no claim that a specific word count earns search visibility or advertising approval. Repeated text, empty archive records and pages whose only purpose is to capture a keyword are excluded from the main publishing inventory. A review or a gameplay conclusion needs an appropriate stated method.
AI assistance and commercial independence
AI can assist with code, structure and drafting. Its output is not evidence. Numerical claims are checked against source records, and unsupported claims are removed. GameInfo does not fabricate personal experience, interviews, credentials or performance tests.
This release contains no paid placements or affiliate buying links. Store links are verification actions. Advertising account metadata identifies the site for review; it is not a statement that an advertising network has approved the site.
Search topics must serve existing work
Keyword suggestions enter a draft queue with their source and observed date. They are not called search volume. An editor must explain the reader intent and identify a substantive target before publishing a metadata change. New terms do not automatically create new pages.
A topic can update a useful existing tool or motivate a new researched article. It cannot be used to produce a set of near-identical city, game or keyword landing pages without a separate useful contribution. The same rendered content is provided to people and crawlers.